Whenever boomer brags about how her crappy house tripled last few decades, it boils my head.

Alright, so your posting history tells me you're Australian. You've complicated things somewhat by mentioning what your house cost nineteen years ago but giving your salary for I assume today, but here goes:

In 2001 you bought your first home for $360,000, but by that time when adjusted for inflation that $10,000 your parents paid was worth a little under $72,000. So you basically paid five times more than they did for your first house.

You and your partners' combined wage is $4,800, so let's say for arguments sake that if only one of your salaries was coming in you would be earning $2,400; that single $90 salary in 1971 is worth a little under $1,000. So you're two and a half times better off than they were, but you paid five times as much for a home. Do you see why you're now being smashed with downvotes here? What exactly was your postgrad degree in?

Also, if you were in a position to buy a home in 2001 then you're significantly older than most of us here, so your "insight" isn't really especially relevant or helpful.

/r/lostgeneration Thread Parent Link - i.redd.it