I see your point, maybe I got a little carried away with exaggeration. My point is that being under such a horrible regime for so long and then finally being free of them is one of the best feelings. But realistically we were thrown from the jaws of one predator to another. And following up on my own logic of there being no greater or lesser evil i guess they're all no different from him, saddam killed a little over a million of us and tortured god knows how many, then the America came along and killed 700,000. Isis cane and raped pillaged and plundered and now iran is trying to top the charts. I guess the main difference is that none of the above have as much power in iraq as saddam did for the 30 odd years he was alive. But all these people making the argument that because america and isis and iran are bad that means saddam was good and it was better under him, that his crimes were sweeter. In the end they're all just as bad as eachother but fewer and fewer people are realizing that. When people look at a conflict between parties they think one is hood and the other is bad, not many consider the possibility of every party being tyrannical, which more often than not is the case