You brought up the Crawford boxes. The only reason you'd bring them up is to discuss he's. So what was your original point then?

My original point was he would possibly hit close to 400 with a better home environment.

The lights are hurting that. And the Crawford boxes do matter there. Because they are so short it reduces the sq ft an LF has to cover which takes away more hits. They also removed the hill which also takes away sq ft again. Doubles and triples are reduced from those factors.

And look at his home road splits. Altuve is substantially better on the road. So again, my point that he would be even better with a different park points to that.

Coors is not hitter friendly because the ball flies a million feet. It's hitter friendly because it is the biggest outfield in baseball. Being massively larger % wise than most parks. Houston gave up a lot of sq ft, so if it helps one way, it's gotta hurt the other.

You want to prove me wrong for god knows what reason. But my point is clear. Altuve is a worse player at home, because of multiple factors, mainly the park. He would be better if he wasn't worse at home. That's literally an impossible statement to argue with.