who was criticizing people for not comprehending properly or being too lazy to dig deeper to find the "good-natured" messaging the union was posting like the link he provided above.

I wasn't criticizing, I was making a point. You are free to see that any way you like.

I said nothing of the name and shame because I posted links in the past to the SCoC's decision on this matter (I'm think in 2013. It's one my profile somewhere).

Also, some fights get ugly. We don't have to like them. Whether this is worth it or not in the end remains to be seen.

So many people on here arguing to be heard changes little. I wonder at times if they even know what they are angry about.

It's nice to have some civil discussion. Thank you.