I'd only support Cold War-style intervention that served to materialize the demands of the Iranian masses, who have been running through the streets chanting about life before 79' and the glory of Persian culture in protest to the totalitarian regime of the Ayatollah since before the New Year. As Michael Ledeen argued the other day, Iran has been at war with America ever since the Revolution began in 79' and prior to 9/11, Iranian Shia militias and Hezbollah had killed the most US citizens as a terror group (including through their use of IED's through their Shia proxies in the Iraq War and enormous bombings of US embassies in the past). The Iranian regime helped mastermind the Syrian genocide, which produced the largest refugee crisis since WWII, destabilized the European political system by propping up nativistic, anti-immigration right-wing leaders, who made simple observations the establishment was unwilling to make. This chain of events helped pave the way for Brexit and possibly contributed to the rise of Trump and a more blood and soil-styled nationalism in America. The regime also has an estimated 250,000 rockets aimed at Israel (in Syria and Lebanon combined) at the moment and they're on the brink of war with Israel. Thus, using new technologies to break the Iranian regime's efforts to block communication and social media, speaking in the international arena by calling on Iran's leaders to free its people, giving publicity to Iranian dissidents and crippling Iran's economy even more severely than it already is (as hyperinflation prevails through the nation) can add much fuel to the revolutionary rage of the good people of Iran to day away with a totalitarian Islamist regime that stole away and appropriated Persian culture to suit its radical, expansionistic goals practically overnight.