Yet another unsubstantiated core allegation of the Mueller report gets rebuked by a judge

What the fuck are you even talking about?

I thought I was asking a pretty simple question. If there's something you don't understand specifically I'd be happy to go over whatever it is with you and clarify.

These accusations are quite direct, bud. This is all stuff you did. I'm asking you what you would do if someone did the same thing to you.

Let's get back on topic:

I'll be honest, I'm not terribly interested in having this kind of conversation with someone who's been so dishonest in disagreements before. What I am interested in is what you'd do if you encountered your own dishonesty.

Legit, what would you do if someone trying to support IATs just like copy/pasted the first google scholar results page as "proof" of IATs or something? How would you respond to someone who mistitled a study they were quoting, attributing the opposite conclusion in the title?

All of that is super interesting to me. Trying to have a good-faith discussion with a person who does those things isn't, so much. It's understandable if you wouldn't want to respond, but I am genuinely curious, so I figured I'd at least give it a try.


/r/thedavidpakmanshow Thread Parent Link -