So judging the credentials of a psychologist is the lane of a lawyer? I siding ask you about any legal questions or case law. You said you’re a lawyer. You said his credentials as a psychologist were insufficient for you. Then you told him to stay in his lane. Is it in your lane, as a lawyer, to judge the credentials of a psychologist?

Did he invite himself to the legislature for testimony? As a lawyer you can explain JP that to me, maybe? Do people just get to walk in to the legislative body to give testimony? Or are they invited by someone? Maybe someone in the legislature?

As a person who can’t do his homework on the credential process for a psychologist (unless you are better at this than the psychology departments of the university of Toronto and Harvard university) how can I trust you on anything else? Including your legal opinion?

Clearly, your standard renders your opinion on everything invalid. Again, your own stated standard.