everyone likes to talk about how trump will start ww3 but clinton's plan to set up a no-fly zone in syria would most likely result in shooting down russian aircraft,it's not ISIS or the taliban flying over syria it's the US and Russia. For those that aren't aware in a no fly zone when an aircraft is detected ground forces establish contact and call for a landing in order to establish a new flight path if the pilot does not comply they are fired upon, there is 0 reason for russia to change their strategy in supporting syria as committing more ground troops is both unpopular and ineffective, this coupled with her consistent blaming of russia for wikileaks and various cyberattacks could very well lead to armed conflict, as she's said she's willing to use diplomatic, economic, and military means to retaliate saying cyber attacks should be treated just like any other attack, this could realistically escalate to nuclear weapons. what about mutually assured destruction? while that was once the case russia has continued to build fallout shelters throughout their country since the end of the cold war including a 400 mile long city beneath the Ural mountains, russia has historically shown no qualms with implementing scorched tactics first seen in 1812 against napoleon and again in ww2 against hitler. We've also just lost our ally in the philippines as the newly elected president has officially called for a separation from the US in favor of stronger ties with china and russia. personally i don't think trump is a better option, he's inexperienced, unliked, and volatile, but it's insane to overlook these facts about clinton's policy. granted for now it's all just talk but she's not alone, senator marco rubio also believes in setting up a no fly zone, and it's not crazy to think that she'll have an axe to grind with russia once the election is over if they are the ones that tried to keep her from the presidency.