I think you've misunderstood some aspects of it. Storage offer per se will come from website visitors GPU/CPU and these people are not being incentivized directly by money, but by not seeing ads. The ones who are directly incentivized by money are website owners.

The point you are making makes sense if you're talking about the initial phase of any marketplace (chicken and egg problem), but that's something the team can begin testing by partnering with some websites who would also be interested in digging up these burried tokens using their already existent visitors base. Beside the fact that the website doesn't need to show Opacity's little agreement warning to all of its visitors (it takes only a small % of them for the website to start making money), many of those have nothing to lose by digging up these tokens early in the game because they themselves could hold the token too. In my opinion, the ones who are going to make the wheel start spinning are small blogs/page owners who do not make much money with advertising any way. After that, it would only be a matter of time to spread the word if the technology is consistent.

As for the token peg, it will be adjusted in the future (not gonna stop in 64 gb), that's where the increasing value comes from. The more website owners join the networking by adding its visitors GPU/CPU power, the more Opacity can increase the storage capacity for one token (network effect and tangle's intrinsic feature).

​