Israel isn't the one whose Constitution requires the destruction of the Palestinians - you have that part backwards.
Would you like to quote that part in the Palestinian constitution?
The Palestinian Government is run by HAMAS. The relevant portions of the HAMAS charter are here.
Do you mean the ones they were storing weapons in and launching them from, the UNRWA schools where they teach the kids how to be terrorists, or the UNRWA ambulances they use to transport terrorists to and from attacks?
The UNRWA is a United Nations sponsored mission. The IDF destroyed UN structures and killed UN personnel.
Yep - which makes none of what I said any less true. The UN structures and personnel were being used for attacks on Israel.
That said, the unfortunate reality is they chose to launch their attacks on Israeli civilians from heavily populated areas, rather than from open areas where there were no 'human shields'.
The Gaza Strip has a population density of 5046/km2. Interesting how 'open spaces' are seldom found when an aggressive colonial power funded by an aggressive imperialist superpower backs you into a corner of your country.
Wow. You've actually never looked beyond the propaganda, have you. ...or maybe you do know better and you're just repeating it deliberately.
Take a look here. ...or you can look for yourself here, and see that there are huge open areas from which the attacks on the Israeli civilian population could have been launched, if the Palestinians had wanted to avoid civilian casualties of their own.
How does it feel being a patsy?
I don't follow.
Well, either you are repeating the propaganda deliberately, or you're being used by those who are. The latter makes you a patsy - I was giving you the benefit of the doubt for not being deliberately deceptive.
Good enough would be for the world to recognize that the Palestinians have been the aggressors since the conflict began, and to make them stop - but failing that, recognizing them as a state so Israel can also works.
Palestine has been subjugated by imperial powers for as long as my knowledge of history dates back, but sure, they're the oppressors.
Your deliberate conflating of the terms "aggressor" and "oppressor" tells me you're not a patsy - you're pushing the propaganda deliberately.