Please tell me why you would use manufacturer/supplier price compared to the retail price of 200.

It is always going to look unfair because it is not an equivalent comparison.

We do not know the cost to them, and without the numbers quoted them, bullshitting some "but only cost like 5 dollar make!" Is asinine to even say. You most certainly start with 200(retail price of product that is our known value) and remove retail costs for each item because we are discussing retail prices.

Does it cost them $200? Nope. But that's not the issue here. And slinging insults doesn't change the fact that people are trying to compare apples to oranges.

Do I think they should've left a misleading product description? Nope. They should've said "it's nylon, sorry we couldnt make the canvas cost effective for us, take it or refund it". It was obviously a mistake/wrong/evil/Nazis[whatever fucking bullshit you want to say] to hide this.

Back to my standing argument: you aren't paying $200 for a bag. You are paying $200 retail(product cost, whatever) for a package that contains a A+B+C+D+bag (a bag that was not delivered, do with that as you will).