Doctor + evidence that doctor purposefully harmed their patient for personal gains = what's required.

And that's exactly what I meant by thousands of cases. Feel free to Google them. Just so you understand - I don't mean that this is the norm - I'm saying that there are precedents and that's why the original analogy doesn't work.

I'm not arguing about the effectiveness of consulting firms.

Neither am I. Honestly I don't follow what you are arguing about at this point. You asked some questions, I gave you some answers, you completely disregarded them and began mumbling something about magic and misplaced expectations. I'm happy that you had good experiences with consultants. I also delivered some great work for our customers and I hope that all the tinfoil theories are wrong. The only point I was making was that I witnessed enough corruption on the inside to believe that such orchestrated moves could be possible with the amount of power consultants get. And that's the part which you're contesting for some reason.

But either way, I still don't think you have any clue what consulting firms do.

Likewise!