The creation of the Russia narrative as a Democrat propaganda piece is in the Wikileaks.

Some key points:

-The first documented instance of the Russia narrative was by Hillary's campaign.
-Hillary's campaign was then caught in multiple lies. Each time revising the lie, then lying again.
-Democrats wouldn't turn over the server to the FBI.
-Democrats at this time were lying about the validity of the leaks.
-Democrats at this time were lying about their primary corruption, leaking debate questions, and everything else they were caught doing.
-The leaks revealed the Hillary campaign creating the Russia narrative as a smoke screen.
-The "Russian" leaker appeared out of nowhere but didn't actually leak any new information, yet the Democrats always referenced this leaker, meaning this fake leaker was most likely a Democrat operation.

And something many people still surprisingly don't know:

-The hacks the intelligence community was talking about at this time were not the Wikileaks. They were separate incidents with separate reports, which the Democrats simply conflated to confuse the public.

When you hear "intrusions" or "hacks" or "Russia hacked the Democrats" or "reports", we're actually talking about many separate incidents and reports spanning years which have nothing at all to do with the Hillary campaign narrative. Try to think of one big organization which hasn't had intrusion attempts, spyware, etc. You probably can't. In fact every big organization has probably been probed by an IP/proxy somewhere in the region of Russia/Ukraine/Kazakhstan/anywhere else on the internet the media calls Russia. Even Republicans have been probed and have had intrusions, complete with reports from intelligence agencies. That's the internet. It happens all the time. So what does it have to do with the DNC Russia narrative? Not a damn thing. And that's the point. The DNC and MSM are liars who are intentionally confusing the public to this day.