The phrase is literally no child pornography, (which I would assume isn't needed to specify as it's illegal almost abroad) and rule 2 i had no gore in either present.

The comma being the key. You keep saying it clearly says no kids. It states very specific instances. We can go on about semantics but your tribute to whoever is why you're stuck, it's just constructive criticism on rules bruv you can keep reading it how you like. Im telling you how I interpreted it and you're saying im wrong but telling me I need to read and its clear is not even an argument when it states specific instances. If your blanket statement was no kids then fine but don't point to rules and call me an asshole for interpreting your old pin. Agree to disagree bud, take care.