It's actually clownishly hilarious and anti-intellectual you took the first Google result as incontrivertable or in the slightest compelling evidence. Nobody claimed "fish pain is non-existent" you literally just took the first result you saw and said "fish are different from humans so it means they dont suffer", scientifically unhinged, and immense cope on your part to keep torturing & annihilating Earth and its beings for your own hedonistic gluttony. The Smithsonian disagrees with you, The Royal Society disagrees with you, The University of Texas Arlington challenges your insane caricature of a stereotype It's actually clownishly hilarious and anti-intellectual you took the first Google result as evidence. Nobody claimed "fish pain is non-existent" you literally just took the first result you saw and said "fish are different from humans means they dont suffer", scientifically unhinged, and immense cope to keep torturing & annihilating Earth for your own gluttony. The Smithsonian disagrees with you, The Royal Society who reviewed 98 studies on fish suffering disagrees with you, (https://www.uta.edu/news/news-releases/2021/04/26/fish-pain), Two papers and an in-depth investigative book by famed researcher Victoria Braithwaite. You have clearly done zero researh on this topic and the entire point of your position is incompatible with the scientific method. You want to keep eating fish so you google "how to keep eating fish and defend my sad gluttony". Literally you have no understanding of any of these topics and your cope is clownishly immense. If you're opposed to scientific consensus in favor of "bruh i wanna keep snacking on trout" you are beyond rationality or coherent reasoning. Nice anti-science cope tho, glutton.