Dozens of cases thrown for "merit"? Source please.

I only know of cases thrown for standing. Which is shorthand for "I don't want to be involved". Standing is notorious as a way judges can refuse cases "with merit".

None of the testimony has been heard by a judge let alone a jury.

Only one state (AZ) had an independent audit. It was done by a Democrat and he deemed 11% of signatures didn't match. By that percentage nearly all states would be up for grabs.

Only one judge allowed for Dominions source code to be inspect (because the case wasn't brought by Trump). The expert claimed huge error, and stated it was programmed to throw errors.

If there was truly a clean election why would all 6 of the contested states have declined an audit. Again only one state allowed for a random sample (and they failed).

I don't care about the outcome. I do care about election integrity. Historically Dems and Reps have argued these issues. It was "non-transparent by force".

There are easy solutions but nether side would ever agree. Why? Because they both are more invested in cheating.

If all citizens were automatically registered and then required ID, and if you were able to verify your own vote.... problem solved.

It will never happen because republicans benefit from voter suppression and democrats benefits from frivolous and in some cases fraudulent votes.

We look like fools to the world. Even my friend from Italy wrote and said... "we are all hoping America can get through this very strange election ".

One thing is certain, we have no authority to criticize North Koreas or Russias elections again.