That's where grooming comes from.

Let me get this straight, if a twenty year old dates a 17 year old which is a year away from what the majority considers 'age of consent' are they suddenly 'grooming underage persons'?

It's so odd that people act like in two years Luke/Kindra/Scrafty would be/would have been completely different people then when they were 16/17. It's not like their pre-teens and he's 40.

Luke and Scrafty's channels were doing perfectly fine without Nappy, as proved by the reaction to the accusations which even Luke has said he wished he handled it better there was no real risk at all.

I don't want to come across like I am victim blaming however StormyKingdra's Twitter comes across like he was some pre-teen and Nappy was 40, not a 17 year old who was messaged by someone barely above their own age.