from my MINIMAL understanding of the situation

Shoe can be civil with people who don't share her views
she doesnt call for hate or to attack people with opposing views at least not in the way both the left and right want her to
the left have taken that to mean that she is a nazi supporter and therefor a nazi

but the more recent drama around why she is yet again a nazi is because she called out Balenciaga on their recent photo shoot

The left think using kink gear as evidence that it was a pedophilic photoshoot is anti-lgbtq+
I get that leather harness gear is a part of fashion and isnt inherently sexual and who cares about it being on teddy bears or in a photo shoot
but the real issue is that the photoshoot was obviously meant to be shocking and edgy hence the use of children but at what point does edgy shock content using real children become problematic?
i agree with shoe on calling it out 'cause there is a line to be drawn here
The right are intentionally weaponising this photoshoot for anti-lgbtq+ rhetoric
The left says it's Shoe's fault that the right are doing that
The left are unintentionally(hopefully) coming off as defending pedophilia because they are doing everything they can to defend Balenciaga from Shoe and this is probably because of Shoes past reactionary takes on drag

Shoes take on drag your kids to pride however was dangerous and ill informed
i can get just looking at it surface level with the "its not gonna lick itself" neon made it seem sus af but it was the venues sign and not a sign for the drag your kids to pride show
she also has the dangerous and ill informed take that drag shows are always adult content which isn't true at all
tldr; Shoe can be civil with people who oppose her ideals
Shoe has had some dangerous reactionary takes on drag and drag shows that the right weponised
the left are now wrongly placing and defensively overreacting on Shoes post about Balenciaga because of Shoe's past actions and perceived lack thereof