Does anyone dare to see the astounding! Straits Times (which I continue to contend - for about 2 months now - had it's name switched from Singapore Straits to the Times. Indeed, there is evidence to support my claim. But there are tons of other things to focus on. One is that they always had ads in the front. (historically...from 1845 until 1941) I know this part since a)it was actually what got me started reading this paper is that someone claimed that Singapore was so ill-prepared for war that they didn't even cover Pearl Harbor on the front page. This is true: they do not cover news on the front page, they only have ads. And I had been reading this paper on and off for about 2 years. And it contains articles that I have thought more than one time "boy what are they going to do about this?" The articles sometimes send different vibes on different subjects and interesting perspectives, but on many a topic -especially when it comes to Japan - they utterly contradict us. And not in any debating sense. There are just articles that would make you wonder what in the world is going on. Like a pact between USSR and US about establishing safe plane travel across the north pole!!! It's jaw dropping. And it's even more so when compared with the tone of the New York Times....and Britain openly wondering what is their problem? But as I said it's far more than that. what we know about much of our history. It's from a British "Normative" perspective. A typical British opinion and deliverer of facts. It's fun to read...and very enlightening. So, we I noted something out of the ordinary I pretty much didn't hesitate to yell fire. What I didn't realize is that I was probably squelched on a certain social network. Anyway. Here is the most concrete and I wish I could send this image. I'll have to find a place that accepts images. But look at the Wikipedia which is right on with 1845 july 15...July 15 is my birthday and 45 is quite memorable in that 100 years later...anyway, I've looked through a number of Singapore ...sorry, straits times and its now contending 1831. My guess is that it has something to do with this guy Apcar Carr Woods...and believe it or not Moses. Wikipedia also has this. I actually have another image of 1897 where it claims the same thing 1831 est. But it is quite different! So...somebody is doing something with the paper...and I also know the content on at least one has been changed!!! my email is [email protected] and just incase...use zecherpa at outlook dot com...this is hacker free at this point!