A common problem I notice with atheists is they try to claim Craig has not proved his premises are true: but they always are either unaware of his arguments or they failed to understand his arguments that establish his premises.

For instance, Craig had a 700 page two volume scholarly work just proving the Kalam Cosmological Argument.

Half the of that, the first book, is devoted just to proving the first premise that all things that begin to exist must have a cause.

But atheists on this forum ignorantly strut around claiming Craig hasn’t prove his first premise just because they watched a youtube video where his opponent never questioned the premise so there was no need to go into it.

They are completely unaware of the actual arguments that he has put into the premise.