Not all? You are only entitled to something if you have been victimized and then you are entitled to reparations for that victimhood. That's how genuine morality works - positive rights are bullshit. You only have negative rights, and based on reason, those are the rights to self-ownership and property rights.
Being deprived of sex via eugenics and/or state systems is a violation of the negative individual right to self-ownership, therefore morally you could simply rape whoever was complicit in that action towards you. That said I have no interest in rape and I'm certainly not interested in having any sexual contact whatsoever with those who stuck me in this position - in fact I would be happy if they were kept clothed when they were hung for their crimes against myself and others since in my opinion nudity humanizes a person, not the other way around, and they've already tried so hard to dehumanize me and humanize themselves in spite of their actions towards me for so long that it would not be just to allow them to play victim superficially one last time. I want my first sexual encounter to be actual sex, not some reptile brained/animalistic/subhuman imitation of it which plenty of "straight" Chads have seemed eager to have with me since I was raped with drugs at 9.
As I implied in that last paragraph, in my case I actually am morally entitled to sex - specifically enough financial reparations to help me purchase a hooker/prostitute/escort/whatever willing to have condomless sex with me who is as sexually attractive as the same-age girlfriend I had at 6 would have been at the onset of puberty, which finding an 18+ year old that looks like that both upstairs and down willing to have sex for pay would be no small fucking task, and the minimum amount required to convince someone like that to have sex with someone that looks like me would probably be enough to push the US economy just over the edge into hyperinflation - because I was actively kept from it by covert eugenics and state systems and if it wasn't for corrupt destruction/withholding of medical records by some of those state systems as well as my socioeconomic status, I could sue the State into at least admitting that it was actively kept from me by those two things - expecting statists to admit personal responsibility for something ever is laughable.
However, even if statists were capable of acting like human beings and taking personal responsibility for their actions even 1% of as much as they expect me to, I live in a country that power trips with sex so much that its not only illegal to buy a prostitute here, but also illegal to go overseas to buy one - and yes, US sex travel laws do not make exceptions for adult prostitutes, they are treated as the same.
I'm not shallow and at this point I obviously would be willing to settle for just about any sexual encounter with the opposite sex as long as its not an obvious, deliberate insult/power trip, not necessarily the one I'm morally owed.
If "women" want to have chads, well, honestly, I don't want to have sex with "women" like that, because if that's the type they prefer, their personalities are what's fucking disgusting. Honestly if a woman wants a chad, she probably is a self-ownership violator who doesn't deserve anything at all. If she doesn't want a chad, I certainly wouldn't wish one on her. Contrary to popular opinion, I'm not a misogynist, and that would be excruciatingly misogynistic. Have a good night.