I know exactly what I'm saying. Russia has nothing on NATO and never had. It's only power is nuclear warfare which NATO wants to avoid at all costs. (The fact that Russia has been unable to capture more than a few cities in the span of 12 days says enough)
Uttering propaganda which having an iota of prior knowledge is what defines your arguments. NATO expansionism is very well know, documented and warned against. So are its warcrimes in Libya etc.. Its actions are perceived as a existential threat by many including Russia, which sought & received assurances against it right in 1990. World is unipolar post cold war and West thinks it can get away with wrecking it while delusionally calling itself some saviour.
"I know exactly what I'm taking about", LOL https://twitter.com/Iyervval/status/1500037686907731970?t=wcm02Hd6SdmKUpzGCaupKA&s=19
Compare that to Iraq war which saw indiscriminate bombing of "brown savages" to ensure "freedom" by West.
https://twitter.com/ClintEhrlich/status/1500029916896579585?t=ZJ7XitEEbRZNh_DBICfbAQ&s=19
I know I haven't said this before but personal insults usually do not convey a believable story. As for the warcrimes have a list buddy: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_war_crimes now go figure. I already said I do not support the actions of the west.
Rich, coming from a guy who resorted to insults in first place.
Didn't you say this, when confronted about US & NATO's invasions and crimes against humanity? -- "The invasions of the middle east are very well known, even despised by many here."
Now you suffer amnesia since you have to put forth a dogged defence for NATO war criminals with Wikipedia (BIG LOL). Duplicity, go figure.
What stops you from answering about the no. of WMD's found by West in Iraq ? Inherent western depravity?
Same can be said about Russia (and you), next.
Much more can be said about NATO (and Netherlands- a former brutal colonist which is complicit it NATO's warcrimes ), next
Summary I got from this was: USA bad, NATO bad and Ukraine bad. But Russia definitely not bad!
"Putin Bad, Putin Mad, NATO defender of good", "No expansionism, only we good" - facile arguments are what I expect with you, so this isn't a suprise that you reduce facts to understand them as - "USA bad, NATO bad and Ukraine bad. But Russia definitely not bad!". You don't disappoint me, tbh, afterall it's all about preserving your echo chamber.
"Azov Nazis the best! Slava Stepan Bandera!!"
NATO has since the 1990s incentivised every “underdog” & terror group to create situations where massacres eventuate, promising the instigator direct or indirect action &/or materiel support. Never seen a more immoral & godless bunch, so deluded about their piousness
The video you linked got cut short and was taken outta context but thanks for your effort.
Aww, atleast you put effort to look for something which bolsters your pre-conceived notions here too.
Azov Neo-Nazis are stuck in besieged Mariupol, it is their HQ. Urban warfare is what they're looking for. They even shot at other side in Volnovakha. That was why corridor was requested for 3rd time. Zelensky's troops and Nazi militias need civilians as Shield Civilian deaths in deliberate urban warfare supports their narrative, not the other way around.
Here's from Sumy- https://twitter.com/RWApodcast/status/1500731611494690820?t=xoAZWbcRefM0SGwRB4K-DA&s=19
120 k ethnic Greeks live in Mariupol, here's a 1st hand testimony confirming same : https://greekcitytimes.com/2022/03/01/greek-in-mariupol -fascist-ukrainian/?amp
Again I think Putin's actions are horrible and cannot be justified in any way shape or form.
No one supports or likes war, even if preventive. But no one other than West with its history of brewing/sparking conflicts, colour revolutions, mass human rights violations and invasions, support for them for their interests (ongoing Yemen) and hawkish policies — bears the primary responsibility for what's happening.
Here's West's presently senile leader — warning against dangers of NATO expansionism — when he was younger : https://twitter.com/ImReadinHere/status/1500782351831662592?t=5QMyp3iCFYZfrP8obDi4Kg&s=19
Out of all your read, you looked for passages which support your biases worldview lol. Tell me, is Kissinger also a Russian Shill?
why should I believe them even after bombing the corridors that they themselves put up for civilians?
Darling, it's about your struggle to preserve your biases and pre-decided stance, I understand that. If they were so keen to bomb civilians, wouldn't they be doing it right away in cities where Azovs are already entrenched to fight an urban war ? Russians have enough firepower for that.
It's the Ukranian troops and Nazi militias which seeks to wage urban warfare like Hamas, using cover of residential areas where civilian live, since civilian deaths bolsters their media narrative against enemy and thus disrupting corridors becomes necessary. They did same in Volnovakha and head of Sparta battalion died when Ukraine breached ceasefire all of a sudden.
Similar to what they did in Zaporizhzhia nuclear power plant and lied about radiations.
Doing what they do the best : https://twitter.com/Qasemebnlhasan/status/1499587999264219137?t=Abmu66qpQhK8Y6cKsUwPbw&s=19
Who in the right mind would handle a molotov like that? The video is portraying a IED specialist who is disarming sometning or exploding munitions that haven't exploded by themselves.
LOL, that isn't how IEDs or unexpolded munitions are disposed by any specialist, that too in middle of a civilian area.
Idc about his boomer opinion. Why present me so much fake evidence? Lol.
"idc about any informed assessment of an actual expert, YouTubers with rhetorics resonating with mine are my gods", sound more apt here.
Evidence? Lol, who came here to defend Azov Nazis greasing pig lard and later even contested the fact of Azovs being self-proclaimed Nazis. As said before, you don't disappoint me.
Exactly what led to this conflict : ideological derangement of West, its hawkishness & chicanery in an unipolar world