You answered your own question. Guns are guns. So what difference, if guns are just guns, would it be to map specific guns. If Erangel is based on "fictional Russia" then that map should have Russian guns, Bizon, AKM, SKS; because guns are just guns.

But you said: They are different in their game play style based on terrain, buildings etc so they should have different guns.

Guns are just guns. The QBZ on Sanhok and the Scar on Miramar are not tailored made for each corresponding map. Guns shoot and kill the enemy, this is their universal trait. The QBZ on Miramar is NOT ‘NOT going to work’ because its not “made for the terrain”. That makes no logical sense.

​

The request to have all guns across maps boils down to guys are only good with one version of a weapon so they want that gun on all maps.

I think it boils down to wanting to use the debatable “Best Guns” on any map, as is with all other BRs and FPS.

​

I like the challenge of not knowing your loadout and working with what you find.

You can still have the challenge with all guns on all maps. Its still going to be random, just all guns are available.

​

Should they have the TukTuk on all maps because someone in the game LOVES to drive that piece of crap, or how about the BANG Bus on Vikendi. It is the map that makes the game, not the gun, because Guns are just Guns.

Vehicles are inherently different than guns. There is no “Snow” gun that works better on VIkendi. But there is a “snow” car and bike that works better on Vikendi.