Let me break it down for you: There are facts, there are people who report the facts. There is no such thing as a netural report. The reporter is not to be "believed" -- he plays the role of a guidepost, of pointing out and linking you to facts you did not know about, facts which you can validate on your own.

Anti-China media has massive funding -- it's shouting through a loudspeaker -- we've all heard their narrative, whether we've seeked it out ourselves or not. The additional information that The Grayzone, New Atlas (the last link) provide is linked in their articles -- it comes directly from western media, the US government, publicly available tax forms, etc. It supplements the western narrative in a manner that defuses it, that makes it seem illogical. i.e. it provides facts that western media, the US government have omitted from their current narrative but have admitted to elsewhere -- e.g. in the past, when it suited their past goals.

Are you against information, learning? Is information in-and-of-itself nefarious? Because the information I've linked to originates in the west, is from your so-called 'rl sources.

I can only suggest that you do as I do: Don't take what any outlet or person online says as truth (only rely on solid evidence, as I've detailed below). What people say online can only be useful as 'guideposts' that point to perspectives you may be unaware of (and need to verify with solid evidence).