I see a trend in your sources. You are super biased and only want to find the information that affirms your preconceived notions. What an awful way to go about learning.

This new "source" you linked is from a book literally titled "Is There Anything Good About Men". Yeah, definitely not a biased source. It even mentions how her peers contradicted her and didn't agree to her research.

I am getting a clearer picture of the kind of a person with the 2 kinds of links you made. Both your links are selling something. One an ad for the website, other an ad for the book. Both are opinion pieces. The second link is literally a blog, not an academic journal.

If you had actually read the article you linked rather than glancing the article you'd know that. But just like you, even the people in the article pulled the same shit. They didn't actually research anything. They just interpreted already published studies and tried to cherry pick the ones that they could project their biases onto. They literally use hypothetical people rather than real cases so you cannot even test their input data.

In short, pretty much every study and every measure fit the pattern that men want sex more than women. It’s official: Men are hornier than women.

They say this with literally not even one point of proof or how they found this conclusion. What were the parameters. What were the measures.

So next time you try to pass off your invalid views as proper facts, try to keep an open mind first and actually look for good research. Not just the first trashy blogs and ads you can find.