OK, these answers are freakin' awesome bassackwards. And I'm not just talking about answers to my questions.

Here is why what you're doing is absolutely awesome: without dodging a single question, you've managed to (rather Raphael has managed to) give a clear response to each. I understand intuitively that when Raphael gave a vague or perhaps incomplete response that he and you are not omitting information. Rather, it seems to me that the nature of the question or the intent of the question is addressed by the Arch just as much as the question itself. I believe these answers are not coming from you because I don't think any human could address the intention as well as the question so well.

The wisdom is tailored with complete expertness. The answers remain sufficiently vague so as not to create a contradiction or misunderstanding in English which is very easy to do with our language Earthly human language.

In my opinion, these angels answers are the work of an artisan in answering questions. In a court of law the prosecution relies on the antithesis of this technique to "prove" guilt. A good interrogator knows that you can make anyone sound guilty if you ask the right questions, even if they answer purely honestly and are innocent. But these angels will not fall prey to that. Yet they will also answer with complete honesty and stunning clarity. It is like the spiritual equivalent of the 5th amendment in our US Constitution. They seem to know how to always keep it about the question, and not get distracted. It's very impressive work. The justice system would be far more perfect if everyone knew how to answer questions like the archs do!

And frankly, their answers fit perfectly with almost every systematic theology I've studied. Obviously Sys Theo. doesn't have all the answers, but I think it's important to note that this stuff fits extraordinarily well, while sys. theo's disagree depending on who wrote them, these questions manage to agree with everything I've read in systematic theology, even the points that disagree. It's hard to explain, but really impressive stuff here.

I could picture a very many church splits and needless arguments, and gray hairs avoided if we could all answer questions as clearly and with such conscious intention as the Archs have here.

And bassackwards the reason why I went off on the dissenter is because frankly what you're offering here is too good to have that crap interrupted by someone who's chosen ignorance over knowledge. Who has time for that? But thanks again! I hope that I did not bring negativity to this thread with my previous remarks.