Again, you are describing what potentially could have happened in some parallel universe, I am basing my judgement on what did actually happen. That's the difference. You are describing what you believe to be the severity of the crime of assault from a legal perspective (I would argue your perception of the law is wrong, as evidenced by the light punishment this lady is receiving and the fact that "minor assault" isn't even a legal concept) despite me repeatedly, over and over again, telling you that I am not speaking in legal terms.

You've having great difficulty understanding this incredibly simple concept and there's clearly nothing that will get through to you, for quite a while now you've been trying to argue just for the sake of arguing so I agree we should just leave it there.