Sure, some players are more likely than others to make the roster, but if a "roster lock" means "99.9%", that is still a prediction until it does/doesn't happen. Sorry but, but you have no authority to make the determination that they are "objectively incorrect"; it really came off very belittling and pretentious.

Furthermore, at the end of my post is some math demonstrating that you were either incorrect in determining what players are true "99.9% roster locks", or you were using some other arbitrary, objective method of determining who the "roster locks" are...... If it's the former, you confirm you pulled the "99.9"out of thin air or you are very misguided about job security in the NFL. If it's the latter, you created a "discussion" based upon a false premise and then belittled someone for making a prediction, which was the same thing you did; you just disagreed with him.

32 NFL teams x ~15 roster locks per team= 480 "roster lock" players in the NFL.

According you you, 480/1000= .48 players (not even one!) will be cut in the ENTIRE league while making the 53 man roster.