Full translation with quotes: 1.

There is no FOSS community" is nonsense... Either back it up with facts or stop spreading nonsense that will be just interpreted as trolling.

I just stated my thesis that there is no FOSS community and he called it nonsense and deleted it. The hypocritial and devious thing about this is that he wants evidence from me, but he is the one deleting it, he also deleted my repost of it including evidence.

1. I asked:

   Hast du nichts besseres zu tun als den ganzen tag das forum zu zensieren? "Don't you have anything better to do than to censor the forum all day long?"

2. Julius wrote.

   Du bist wirklich der einzige den ich zensieren muss, und ich mache das nur weil ich denke das ein paar von deinen Beiträgen nicht schlecht sind. Sonst wärst du schon lange komplett gesperrt. Was nebenbei bemerkt in 10 Jahren auch erst der zweite oder dritte Fall wäre (mal >von Spammern abgesehen).

Julius wrote: "You are the only one I'm forced to censor and he only does it because some of my posts are good, otherwise I would have been banned for completely already for a long time. He says in 10 Years it is only the second or third case of a ban apart from spammers." Interesting fact here is that Julius admits doing censorship and justifies it.

1. I asked:

   Warum "musst" du das denn? Nonsense schreiben viele. I asked why he has to censor me all the time, because many people write "nonsense". Hypocritical part of this is as well, that I'm calling out nonsense with evidence, but he just deletes it and lets nonsense by others always pass. Hypocritial double standards again.

2. Julius:

   Nicht so penetrant und infundiert wie manchmal bei dir. Außerdem 'muss' ich das, da sonst Charlie dich wieder sperrt. Meist schaffe ich es deinen größten Unsinn zu löschen bevor er es liest :p Davon mal abgesehen kann das kein Forum lange akzeptieren wenn jemand dauernd nur provokativ andere kritisiert. So was kann ein Forum komplett töten weil die meisten >darauf keinen Bock haben.

Translated: "Not so penetrant and unfounded like from you. Additionally I'm "forced" to do that, because otherwise Charlie would ban me again. In most cases I'm able to delete the biggest nonsense by you, before he can read it. Apart from that, no forum tolerates very long when someone is provokative and critical all the time. Such a thing can kill a forum completely, because most people do not like that"

So there he says it "Criticism is not allowed" and he says it will kill a forum, but the reality is, the forum is already close to dead and when I post some debates there is much more activity then before.

1. I wrote:

   Also muss kritik zensiert werden? Ja kritik ist echt schrecklich. Translate: "So criticism has to be censored? Yes criticism is truly horrible." Some cynical reply from me.

2. Julius answered:

   Weil/wenn es absolut nichts zur Diskussion beiträgt und nur Streit provoziert, ist es nicht wert geposted zu werden. Das ist keine Zensur sondern "noise reduction"... was jede >Form der Kommunikation braucht sonst ist es irgendwann nur noch gegenseitiges Anschreien.

Translate: "Because "it" corntibutes absolutely nothing to the debate and provokes conflict and therefore it is not worth to be posted. That is not censorship that is "noise reduction" what every form of communication needs, because otherwise everybody is just shouting at each other."

So here he says that "it" meaning criticism contributes "absolutely nothing" to a debate and therefore is not worth to be posted. So in Julius world debates have no criticism, while in reality criticism is a most essential part of it. And only those people freak out who are not civilized. Other hypocritial double think what he does is "this is not censorship" while previously clearly admitting he is doing censorship.

1. Lastly I asked: >Darf ich die Mails zwecks Dokumentation veröffentlichen? Leute verlangen danach. "Can I release those emails cause of documentation, because people are demanding it"

10: His reply:

Welche "Leute" denn?

I>ch habe deinen Beitrag auf Reddit gelesen und finde es ehrlich gesagt sehr grenzwertig wie du da in der Hitze des Gefechts die >Tatsachen verdrehst.

Was Charlie dann teilweise geposted hat ist sicher auch nicht so toll, aber zumindestens hat er zugegeben Fehler gemacht zu >haben.

Aber wenn du versprichst das original samt ehrlicher Übersetzung zu posten und dabei schreibst das ich dich schon mehrfach im >Forum gewarnt habe und du schon einmal für das Gleiche temporär gesperrt worden bist, kannst du das gerne veröffentlichen.

Aber ehrlich gesagt... hast du wirklich nix besseres zu tun als dich darüber aufzuregen? Du meinst doch das das alles großenteils >Mist ist was auf FGD geschrieben wird, also warum liest du es dann überhaupt? Keiner hat etwas davon das weiter zu führen, und >es ist eigentlich alles zum Thema gesagt worden.

Beste Grüße

-Julius

Translation: "What people

I have read your article on reddit and find it borderling how you manipulate the facts. What Charlie posted was partly also not nice, but at least he admitted making mistakes. If you promise to post the original including honest translation that I warned you multiple times and you already been banned temporarily for the same thing, you can gladly release it. But honestly, do you have really nothing better to do then to argue about that? You think that most of everything posted on the forum is nonsense and why you read it then? Nobody benefits from keeping this going and everything is said to this topic"

So there he denies that anyone here asked for the emails and accuses me of manipulation, while I just proved that he is a manipulator. You can decide for yourself if those were warnings. Fact is I was never warned that my posts will get deleted nor being warned that I will be banned. Only harassment in form of "If you do not stop writing nonsense you will be..." This is a not defined subjective thing, how am I supposed to react to that? He will just decide "Oh that is nonsense, I have to delete you now" while deleting every evidence by me proving that it is not nonsense. And I find it quite important to showcase the behavior that some people use to play power games and wreck a community they never contribute to.