I cited Reuters, MSNBC, and USAToday - and you're calling those alt-right articles?!?
Ah so we are now entering the Kellyanne Conway portion of our debate where you just make stuff up. I'd love for you to point to the part where I said Reuters, MSNBC, and USAToday were alt-right articles. I didn't. You are lying. In fact, what I said was
So, you'll Google it some more and find some alt-right articles that "demonstrate some more violence" but in reality are a couple of events
In very clear terms I spelled out that you would Google it "some more" which means that you would have already had to have Googled it to obtain the articles that you did (which, if you used Yahoo or something, my bad) and that you would be Googling it again. Further, "and find some alt-right articles" which clearly demonstrates something that will soon be done, and not something that had already done.
I would think that it was just a mistake that you weren't purposefully trying to lie. But, then you followed with these whoppers.
This isn't a secret war at all, it's very public, and IS being covered in mainstream media or I wouldn't have those articles to show to you.
Wait, you just said this:
I'm not saying you're stuck in your own echo chambers, but maybe they don't show as much of the violence on the news sources that are sympathetic to the protesters.
So...is it being covered or no....? Because you say it's being covered or obviously you wouldn't have those articles, but prior to that you were saying that it wasn't being covered that much. I mean having lived in Oklahoma for most of my life, I tend to think that if there was a roaming gang of liberals terrorizing the neighborhoods, Kelly Ogle is covering that shit.
Either way, I could cite several more mainstream articles about the anti-Trump violence occurring in the U.S., but I'm not sure any would convince you if you don't want to be convinced.
I would LOVE, LOVE, LOVE, LOVE to be convinced. LOVE IT! Yet, you continue to say "...I could go on and on..." and then don't. And do you know why that it is? Because it's a lie. You can't because it's not true. It's why people like Conway use made up things like Bowling Green to push their agenda. Because they have spoiled the truth so much, that you think "Gee...did the liberal media cover up a whole tragedy?" And therein lies your justification to continuing pushing this phony anti - Trump violence.
But groups like J20, Antifa, etc. are exactly the types of groups I'm talking about and both would be traditionally considered radical left wing groups. I'm sure people on the right didn't like Timothy Mcveighs groups being called right wing either but it is what it is. These are far left groups that have taken the place of far right wing groups in the 90's, and unless you sympathize with them I don't know why you are defending them.
First, to insinuate in anyway that I'm defending these groups is a dick move and is once again, a blatant lie. I have called them illegal and disgusting. So, if that is your idea of support then I don't know what to say.
Second, you do understand that none of those groups are left wing? They aren't right wing. They aren't anything. They don't have a wing. So when you try to clump them in with liberals you miss the obvious point. They don't like us either. So once again you are really pushing a narrative that does not hold up to any amount of scrutiny.