It’s not uninformed as 3% difference when comet is much more popular across the boards in all elos. The sample sizes are decent sure but where does that sit when aery isn’t as popular, making “aery is better” just an incorrect argument. If the sample size is smaller than the other keystone the winrate percentage is just simply incomparable.

And also THATS incorrect. Certain champs FALL in high elo and do too well in low elo, hence why certain champions get corrected. And if we are on actual statistical basis. High elo really doesn’t start until D2 and that’s being generous. Meaning that only around 2 percent of the player base is being examined? Seems a little weird to base everything on that. When THAT sample size is exponentially smaller than the others.

Also the actual argument itself falls flat when actual pro Janna players apparently like comet more. Thanks