here are specific questions i'm unsure about. any thoughts?

in the video linguistic genius of babies, what evidence does the speaker use to affirm that a human helps with language development? - children did not respond to 12 videos - no indication of learning when the children were exposed to audio/visual learning as opposed to a human - children displayed social interactive skills only with a human.

the video indicates it's B. BUT, i have a feeling it could also be C since, well, both were true. sigh.

which classroom method aligns with nativist theory? - consideration of individual learning styles - communicative competence - both

which classroom methods align with constructivist theory? - opportunities to notice language - focus on skill development - both

according to behaviorist theory, which is least effective? - drilling - situational language teaching - error correction

according to piaget's stages of development video, when has someone reached formal operational stage? - when they assimilate their learning - they can deal with abstract theories - they process complex ideas

the video would hold that B is true because it says, "hooray! abstract thought!" but the reading refers to being able to assimilate their learning as the goal. What. The. Eff.

which is a functional theory of LA? - constructivist - behaviorist - nativist

SOMEONE HALP!