I mean, the USSR was all of those things you are describing. They even had the same exact phenomena, where their trade unions were nearly 100% about controlling the people, and were NOT about bargaining. In fact, I've already written this elsewhere in this thread, about the USSR.

Once again, you seem to be ASSUMING that a socialist is the same thing as a COMMUNIST, or a Marxist Socialist. Socialism does NOT AT ALL have to be Global, and it does not AT ALL have to be marxist. Nationalist Socialism is JUST as much Socialism, as Marxist Socialism, with the main difference being that Nationalist socialism has the goal of helping the nation, and maintaining national sovereignty, whereas the Marxist Socialists wanted to get rid of national sovereignty, and help the GLOBE.

Hitler took massive amounts of wealth from the jews, and spent it on social programs, in one of the biggest single acts of "wealth distribution" in human history. The Communists took massive amounts of wealth, and gave it to the oligarchs. Which is more "left wing", or "socialist"? Hitler's taking of massive amounts of wealth from Rich Jews, and giving it to the Nation, in the form of social spending? Or Stalin's taking of massive amounts of wealth from the rich, and poor, then giving to the rich?

Militarism, and Nationalism, are not IN ANY way mutually exclusive with socialism. Nationalism is mutually exclusive with MARXIST socialism, which like many people in this thread, you are confusing as the same thing as SOCIALISM in general, or NATIONAL socialism.