Where does Zizek explore the neutrality and aesthetics of Beethovens 9tht used for propaganda ?

call me an idealist but zizek is so lame to acknowledge music that might adhere to any eternal value. why must he read lies and deceit into everything? in less than nothing he says that tonal music after shostakovich is a "lie". yet we should all be atheist Christians? keep that shit my dude. there's a reason he doesn't get Nietzsche; he is the womanizing dogmatist that would rather put his last hope into a sure nothing than an uncertain something. everything, the fucking utilitarian critique of toilets, we're controlled by our subconscious, yet he clings to christian morality all the tighter. how could you possibly reconcile the scientific absence of free will with christianity? isnt that the reason democracy has failed? fuck this guy man. yet oOoOO im a pessimist oOoOo i know more because im so wise about the reality of existence. degeneration. completely lacking in stamina. fuck this dude yes i am an incel fight me

/r/zizek Thread