Did you even read the page you linked to? Nothing there contradicts what I said.

Them:

Wikipedia pages often cite reliable secondary sources, which vet data from primary sources. If the information on another Wikipedia page (which you want to cite as the source) has a primary or secondary source, you should be able to cite that primary or secondary source and eliminate the middleman (or "middle-page" in this case).

Me:

No, you're not going to list "Wikipedia" as the source, but the actual source is just a click away.

This is such a silly argument anyway. You're essentially arguing that Wikipedia can't be trusted but google image results can?