Yeah, it's almost like we're not actually at a fucking debate. The evidence you asked for wouldn't have even disproved my fallacy in the first place, you fucking dense, demanding little twit. Either way, it's "whataboutism." I'm just making the comparison that everybody's thinking, and if you wanna question it, look it up yourself, because I already did that. There is no actual win condition for this "argument" so what's the point?

If someone points out a logical fallacy, it's your turn to prove that it isn't.

Lol No, it's not. Arguing by trading fallacies is a fallacy in itself. Your argument, just like my "argument" isn't worth seriously responding to.