Personally even though Amberlynn is a known liar I think it’s important to validate information especially ones that are about health. I don’t want to simply take what anybody says as factual especially if it’s to the point of saying that someone doesn’t care about their dog. As much as I dislike a person, I wouldn’t call them abusive (or more abusive) to their dog without proper and factual evidence to support so. I didn’t cyberstalk her, I didn’t have to look for her location at all. All the information was readily available and known. Obsessive, maybe, but that’s subjective. All I did was put two locations together to ensure that she did lie about not knowing of any vet centres.