Any alleged "scientists" who believe that alleged behaviors/feelings are "illnesses" just because the APA votes that they are is not an actual scientist.

Ill let them know you said that, theyll care greatly

Let's be frank: you are endorsing a religious concept of simply pretending that various alleged behaviors & feelings are illnesses. You have made no argument that such is real and scientific.

Is dis-associative identity disorder an illness?

Again, a computer could be built where the doctor would put the info & physical measurements in & the computer would tell them what drugs were safe.

Lol, its so easy to say this, since you dont have to build it. We can say this for pretty much every profession. a computer could be built, oh ok thanx genius.

So where is this computer, if its so easy, where is it?

Those physical measurements (plus all the other data) could be put into a computer which determines what chemicals/drugs/etc are safe & what isn't.

Whats that computer model called, i want to inform my doctor about it. And actually databases already exist that deal with drug combinations, but even those are not enough

That's just an assertion without an argument, & again a computer system could be built to replace such & does partially already exist.

And a space ship could be built that travels at 90% the speed of light. You are making this "could be" assertion as if its so easy.

I never said about measurements, i simply talked about specific illnesses where knowledge of chem is necessary and simple databases dont confice. for example: If a patient falls into the metabolic acidosis or alkalosis categories, how do you properly treat them?

Im waiting for an answer to that question. But let me guess, a computer could be built right? Ofcourse it can, anything could be built.

Incorrect. In much of human history there has been an idiotic/moronic ruling class. Lords, kings, etc were the old names. Now we have inheritors, stock owners, etc. The create hierarchies of underlings who obey them & their idiocy. You are just assuming these rulers are correct in all of their idiotic ideas, which is not rational.

Incorrect. So be specific, you seem to have a problem with being specific. You said his idea was idiotic, how is focusing on creativity not important for business majors. Why is the policy idiotic? If you find it idiotic. Please elaborate and be specific, I notice a trend where you struggle with being specific, what classes should business majors take and why?

SPECIFIC