I think you’re misunderstanding me. Jared‘s outbursts are bad for digibyte regardless of what side they take because you can’t simultaneously act as the authority of a decentralized currency AND pretend you’re not an authority just because you say it’s decentralized. Nobody is trying to cancel Jared, they’re just trying to get him to shut the fuck up so the other 100 million people who believe the opposite as him will invest into digibyte. Or do you invest because you’re hoping one day you can give Jared a blowie? That’s cool too I guess.

Jared refused to even look at several suggestions on gitter— including code. He’s singlehandedly removed access for people after throwing a public tantrum. That’s not decentralized.

Idc what Jared believes because I know how to read and understand how ridiculous he sounds. What I do care about is whether or not his decisions are based on the good of digibyte or the good of the several for profit businesses based on digibyte that he’s created (and failed at by his own admission)

If you really don’t see a conflict of interest by having the founder as one of three people with control of the digibyte social media AND the final say for the direction of the “decentralized” blockchain, then you’re a moron.