NO, I DID NOT slander anyone. you did so thru a subtle link but in fact, you didn't say anything @all actually with your statement. let's have a look shall we:

It's difficult not to be critical of the chess.com CEO and of challenges with the pawn promotion UI. (I was thinking of the en passant glitch Chess24 has/had.)

the start of yr statement is an argumentum ad populum or appeal to mass, to the people, except you've done so without 'us' - presumably cus you relied on ppl not to read the link. what stands out tho is that you state there is criticism there w.o any further insight. so no, I could not slander you cus you simply didn't say anything @all. you obviously manipulate the reader by the way you then equate what is spose to be concerning criticism for the CEO to a trivial error in code that causes a glitch. there is method in this. and now you claim I slandered an international master cus I refuted you & his very empty sentiment as if I should hold in high regard his view on economics. this is an appeal to authority & a weak one. I welcome you to try again so that I continue to break down yr devices. or I encourage you to be honest if you have anything meaningful to say.