If words can't explain K's theory of "What is" (No-Self) why do you produce walls of text explaining it?

The state that you think is what K thinks is possible is not possible its a delusion. You have not experienced this state, yet you are explaining it to me. Not a single human has experienced this state, but some believe they are in this state.

I am not saying without memory, I am saying the words K uses suggest this - even though he is not meaning this. My point is he contradicts himself in those 80 video talks.

You keep telling me how I don't understand what K is saying and that I am misunderstanding K's words. I'm telling you that you are misunderstanding my words.

You are talking of a state you have not experienced as if a FACT - and that this state is a possible state that exists.

/r/Krishnamurti Thread Parent