Biases can always be seen

These words right here instantly say you don't understand biases or that you have studied biases

If you ask any person who studies biases as their profession or some of the best minds on biases regarding stock markets and similar things you will have every single one of them tell you no person can see all their biases, Now if you disagree with them all that means you are smarter then them all even without studying biases as they have done all their life.

You are saying you are seeing biases in me. Where are they?

your rose-colored glasses in K which I explained in other post

How do I post to Bha90? And why do you think I would be angry or annoyed at him? I see a mistaken man. That is all.

whenever he replies to you basically have a go at his religion, I saw you argue with him so many times. you talk to him differently than you do with others.

You are also saying he was corrected over and over and adapted to that. It is not correction, what he says does not portray what he means so when it is questioned, he has to put it in proper terms. This is not out of the ordinary.

Not talking about those corrections only. I'm talking about when he said something which was totally flawed and Bohm corrected him he would say he meant different when you could see he didn't. You will now reply he did mean different and that i don't understand him and why i am saying what i am saying since i am mislead.

You are telling me cult members do the same. Telling me that does not mean anything.

neither does telling them

You say I say the same thing about UG. Yes, this also applies to UG.

you believed UG was in a different state then the state you are saying K us talking about