You replied to the wrong comment. Take some pills and get back to your senses if you ever had them.
If I did that, I apologize.
Tell me what the fuck they are doing on that site. What is the purpose of them being there?
Sorry, but you can't suport your claim by just making wqq
Is not strange, one can not please everybody, people who hate others will always exist.
You're ignoring the fact that others hate you where ethics and such are discussed, yet are ''liked'' (I can barely call it being liked.) at places where it's known that others don't care about animals much and are only there for the sex.
All of them? Evidence to support your claim?
Read the comments yourself. You've told me to do the same, so I did and found others who clearly don't care about animals.
Like I said, you claimed that everybody hates me, the fact that people exist who doesn't hate me (some of them are zoophiles) shows that your claim is fallacious.
Nobody takes the word ''nobody'' that seriously. In fact, I just used it now. Don't be a dumbass, I've never seen someone take the word so literally. It's pretty sad and cringy.
If supporting other sexual minorities (including the pedosexuals) hurt us, so be it. I won't be a bigot just to not hurt our cause. I won't be like the homosexuals who doesn't support zoosexuals just to not hurt their cause.
That's not how it works. If you don't support something it doesn't mean you are against them OR hurt them. This is some sad logic. Are you one of those retards that claim ''You're either with us, or you're against us.''?
And again, you only looked at the hate mail. There are comments in my channel that are as old as 8 years. There are thousands of comments in there, you only looked a few and gloss over the good ones focused on the haters. Again, just one person being on my side is enough proof that your claim is a hasty generalization fallacy,
Uh no, I looked at the most recent ones like usual. You're claiming something that again you have no evidence of. You're just accusing me of something because you cannot accept the fact that you are disliked.
Invalid excuse. The norm if to take a comment literally unless the person makes IT clear that he doesn't mean it in a literal way, you have failed to add marks to point out that your comment is not to be taken seriously.
No, nobody I have ever met (And because you're a special snowflake who doesn't understand basic shit very well, I'll just say that the first ''nobody'' in that sentence is to be taken literally.) has taken the word ''nobody'' ever so literally. You have failed to use common sense and basic knowledge, so you are the one that failed.
What invalid excuse? Evidence? What delusional behabior? Evidence?
You just did by saying I have to point out everything that's not to be taken too literally, yet you know damn well what I meant. Also, mind explaining me what ''behabior'' means? You keep using the fake word yet I've never anyone else use it before nor have I found it in a dictionary. I guess it's not new you're making shit up.
Yet, they don't prove that all zoophiles or that everybody hates me? So, try again. Remember, your claim was: NOBODY LOVES YOU.
And you know exactly what ''nobody'' was meant as. Don't be a 5 year old and pretend you don't know.
Argument from ignorance fallacy.
Nope, the majority of comments on these sites are always against you.
And?
It's the explanation. Stop pretending to be a dumbass. I can't believe a person older than 14 does not know any of this. Really, really sad.
Red herring fallacy.
Read that again, there's no red herring going on. You really are talking about shit you don't know. Maybe if you didn't abuse and scream the word fallacy maybe something reasonable might come out of you once. Don't know, it's a very wild guess. Knowing it's you, I'm probably wrong on that.
False attribution fallacy. I know well that I have hatters.
Indeed, and now you realize the majority is against you. Good job Ally.
What? I think you missed some words in your sentence. Care to make that sentence again with better grammar?
No, you're the one who doesn't understand shit. Do I really have to explain like you're a 2 year old? Maybe it's because you don't want to understand.
And that proves what? Because that doesn't support your claim that everybody hates me. It only proves that some people hate me.
Some = most.
Sorry, and that makes my excuse invalid how?
That's how logic works. If you can't come up with evidence because you use an excuse that does not make sense, it's an invalid excuse. Goddamn you don't even learn shit like this in school: It's that obvious.
You are using circular logic
And you're using none.
you are failing to point out why it is invalid. All you doing is saying that my excuse is invalid because you say that it is invalid.
I don't. You don't have evidence and use excuses that don't make sense.
First, burden of proof is on YOU, not me, you are the one making the accusation that nobody supports me.
Most humans, you mean. I already gave evidence for that, and that's every site you're on. Read the comments yourself.
Second, I don't even need to prove that I have supporters because again, burden is on you, not me. Look at the tread, my claim that I have supporter was in response to your claim that i don't have them, so who has the burner of proof? YOU have it. You made the claim about my supporter first.
You claimed that you had supporters or humans who liked you. Show it then.
Like I said, I won't post her name in the open, I don't even know if she is a open zoo in reddit.
And like I said, you can blur out the name. Are you that dumb? See, this is one of your invalid excuses. You're refusing to show evidence.
PS: I don't remember claiming that I have more fans than haters. Can you stupor that accusation with evidence?
I didn't say that either.
Translation: I don't care about having a rational mature debate with you.
Translation: I put words in others mouths because I can't defeat their real arguments. You really are childish with that shit.