Then you're not too educated on the subject.

Sorry I'm not in the habit of fucking animals and the closest I got to that was fucking a brunette woman in a leopard costume as a Halloween party in 2012. The woman in question was a human being in case you're wondering.

Animals have sexually specific body language. In the case of male dogs, that would tend to be mounting and humping behavior.

Edit: I realized that I was rather vague here. Mounting and humping behavior, in addition to other pieces of body language which indicate quite a few things about how the animal feels. Mounting can be a sign of stress, or a form of play, as well as a sexual behavior, so it isn't sufficient on its own.

Oh so it is also a sign of stress? I already know that why the fuck do you think I'm worried about him? I found an abused stray dog in very bad shape, a dog who might not even be a dog, either I take him to the vet or a friend does, my neighbor checks in on him when she can, he's brushed, I feed him a raw meat diet that he's physically thriving on, I dote on the odd little guy. Ok maybe not so little, once he's back to his optimal health he should be 180 pounds. I don't want to imagine what being raped and traded back and forth behind my back will do to him. He's still getting used to being around me and as I said I'm not going to ruin that by trusting him to someone like you.

That said, the issue is certainly more complex than "oh look he's lying there better unzip".

I find it impossible to believe that. For all I know you'd think "Oh look his owner's gone and he's walking around. If you don't tell I won't tell so have fun!"

Furthermore, if you had read my other posts, you might have happened across this: I would have thought that this would be obvious, but let me make it a bit more clear all the same. One of the reasons for this is so that a person knows and understands the animal's body language in general, their temperament, and the way they generally express themselves.

You don't give a shit about the rights and feelings of the owner so I doubt you'd care about your future(or previous) victim's feelings and rights.

If someone were to have sex with your dog, by my standards, they better know him well enough that they understand everything you just listed about his temperament and his general demeanor, and a hell of a lot more.

People like you don't care about that. All you see is an easy hole to stick it in.

I don't get why you quoted my "No?" unless you were misreading the tone.

Oh I'm not misreading your tone.

"No?" in this case does not mean "golly gee I'm really not sure", it means "No, and also what the hell is wrong with you, why are you even asking such an idiotic question?".

Oh well excuse me for asking an admitted liar who turns a blind eye to his buddies raping the pets of unsuspecting owners what's wrong with him, you fucking sociopath. Guess you're not too much different than your friend /u/Aluzky are you now?

Sometimes tone does not come across very well over text, so I apologize for not being more clear, but allow me to remedy that. I have zero tolerance for rapists, regardless of what species they choose to rape.

Coming from a guy who says he won't snitch on a friend who rapes a dog that doesn't belong to them I going to have to call bullshit on your zero tolerance for rape stance.

On that note, it is not "gallant" to protect someone from being raped.

Well not you anyway.

It's the bare minimum to not be despicable.

Assuming you actually find such things despicable.

I've argued elsewhere that I think punishments for actual animal abuse (including rape) should be tightened to be in-line with abuse against humans.

But snitches get stitches if someone blabs about raping the dog of their best friend behind their back amirite?

You wouldn't know that, of course, because you've read very little about what I've said on this subject - understandable, of course, I don't expect you to go digging through my post history.

Well from what I know about you right now and your stance on abuse and personal views you apparently can't be trusted around other people's dogs especially if you bring one of you zoo buddies along.

However, it also appears you haven't even read what I've said in this topic alone, considering how you've so failed to understand my position.

You mean failed to understand why you'd freely allow someone to rape a dog that doesn't belong to them and then lie about to the owners face.

And that I will criticize you for.

Ask me if I care and I have every right to criticize you because of what you said.

That said, considering you've decided I'm a liar, I doubt anything I say is going to be taken seriously. It didn't have to decide you were a liar you said that yourself. So why don't you act like an adult and take responsibility for what you said instead of playing the persecution card because that game is getting old.

Doubting someone's sincerity in a conversation is a surefire way to end any chance at productivity that conversation had.

It's hard to believe someone who says that they will lie to cover up the actions of others while also admitting that they would lie to people that more that likely trust that person.

So I don't know why I even bothered with this, except that for as much as I dislike you right now for a number of reasons,

I don't give a fuck if you dislike me or not. People dislike me for doing my job anyway so a random guy on the Internet saying he dislikes me for thinking he's a lying zoophiliac sociopath who would lie to someone's face about what he lets his friends do to their pets behind their trusting backs doesn't particularly faze me.

I don't think you're coming at this from a bad position -

First smart thing you've said the entire duration of this corespondence.

I don't think you're insincere, at least.

I don't have the time for insincerity and I sure as hell don't violate the trust others have in me. I've seen enough people who had their lives ruined after trusting people who stabbed them in the back over it.