"Our individual best interest" and "the global population" are already two different things. I was speaking of how people feel, referring to the obvious personal drama on these photos. I did not extend the discussion to far-reaching other considerations.

Your level of argument is delusional and totalitarian: If you think there can be anything which requires that "population has to be decreased", and you even start imagining how to do that, by drugs or sterilisation, you are exactly on the level of "final solution ...", if you know what I mean. Low resolution thinking always leads to totalitarianism.

You should not unnecessarily extend this discussion to entirely different levels. "Climate change" from cold to warm in an interglacial period first needs to prove to be bad ... Before everything else, can you see how it is used to make people think in terrible ways about population control? You are suddenly discussing from a position we thought we had already excluded.

I had a much simpler aim: Let this guy in peace. He is suffering from an instinct – many other people may also have. just saying. no big politics behind that. I am not the new dictator of the world with the biggest possible solution for everything.