Ok, here is the deal with AKA legal strategy. The DEA has made it pretty clear that no action will be taken Sept 30 and that should any action be taken they will give people (like the Congressional letter signees for example) at least 48 hours notice. We don't know when, or even if, it's going to happen but we can say with near certainty it won't be Friday. A Temporary Restraining Order (TRO) or petition for injunction is to be filed AFTER the DEA acts, not before, since there is no action yet to enjoin. We do not support filing litigation precipitously and are working hard to present our evidence and arguments to DEA, we expect DEA to take our arguments very seriously and to meet with our attorneys, as well as take those comments from the many members of the public who have voiced their opinion and shared their stories, and from the many members of Congress who are supporting their constituents very seriously. People filing a lot of injunctions on their own claiming harm are making medical claims which could hamper our efforts that this should be treated as a botanical supplement and not a drug. And a judge will tell them that even with a schedule 1 substance, a doctor can still prescribe (I know this is a lot of BS to us, but that's what a judge will say) so nothing but some large hoops to go through will actually cause harm. I am just reporting from consultants and attorneys, please don't shoot the messenger. The legal letter we submitted is far more detailed than what a TRO will entail. Our attorneys have always known we wanted a TRO and have been getting prepared for one. It will be a lot easier to put together now and a lot less complicated with the highly detailed letter they already submitted. What we are now doing is trying to determine the best angle we should take to base a TRO on, should the scheduling happen.
