You're saying he chose the method that would kill the least amount of people? You actually believe that?
You've completely missed my point. Let me try again:
it is within the realm of possibility that between those three options, the shooting could be the lowest casualty result
A couple of facts for you:
Number 1: We are reviewing the events after they have happened. The shooter obviously could not know for sure how things would go down. If he was still alive and found out the number of casualties, would he be disappointed that he didn't choose a method that could have harmed even more people?
Number 2: I am not the FBI Profiler, and I'm willing to bet neither are you. We can't know what the motivations were, so this is all speculation.
Number 3: It is a FACT, that airplanes and bombs impacting large crowds would have had a high casualty rate, and I have stated that it is IN THE REALM OF POSSIBILITY that an airplane crash or a bomb would have resulted in more casualties. Again, it's IN THE REALM OF POSSIBILITY.
So, no. I don't actually believe that he wanted to kill the least amount of people. Obviously. I'm stating facts and speculating on what might have been.
You're a bit of a snarky little shit for saying that, though. So fuck you, and have a nice day.