Moral Arguments are some of my favorite

Philosophical ones are, but not something so trivial as this one. You’re over estimating the situation in your head.

1 dimensional thinking back at it again, why can’t it just be for fun for me?

Because arguments aren’t just one person, it’s both sides participating. Something you’d anticipated if you weren’t thinking one-dimensionally.

when I see flawed logic, I want to attack it

Putting aside how cringey this statement is, the best part about ethical debates is there’s no objective logic, flawed logic in that instance is just moral points you don’t agree with.

Since you can’t take a hint, I don’t want to debate much further. I am going to enjoy my night, and I hope you have a good one too. Bye man!