you
I posted it too early, and have since reposted my completed response. Feel free to respond to that.
None of this speaks to the above claims that logical argument is impossible
Like I said, you don't understand reason. You came to this conclusion via cyclical logic, which I've already stated.
All arguments are based on rules that presuppose that logic can deduce sound conclusions, based on evidence.
Logical arguments are based on evidence. You keep making same mistake because if you were actually willing to address my argument, you'd probably come to the rational conclusion that there is no god. And if your god belief truely is an egocentric defense mechanism, which I previously stated, then that would be a no no, wouldn't it?
Evidence is objectively real. Its not the same as conjecture. Conjecture is only valid if supported by evidence. And that is exactly the boundary that separates theoretical physics from quantum mechanics. I line you've already attempted to confuse.
It does not matter that you do not accept the premises, nor does it matter if you don't hold by the logic.
It doesn't matter what any of believe in light of evidence.
There is no evidence to directly infer the existence of a creator.
There is no valid claim that can be used to make reliable and reproducible predictions.
There is no need. There are better explanations.
There is evidence for the invention of religion by human beings, and its gradual evolution into diverse, and often conflicting belief systems.
My argument involved probabilities and the necessary properties of a principle to explain how highly unlikely events happened.
Based on incomplete information and your assumption that the universe was in a very improbably state of entropy at the time of the big bang. I did address this. Scroll up if you have to.
Also, you missed the point of my, much simpler, analogy. Without information on the rapist himself, or the circumstances that precipitated the big bag, you can't infer anything without evidence. Again, evidence is the concept that keeps going over your head.
Not so ridiculous anymore.
1:10000 pregnancies happen without intercourse. (While there are other methods of getting pregnant, they are comparably rare)
Completely ridiculous. Your first point is false information. I dare you to support this with evidence.