I deleted my previous reply to you as you were in the middle of typing your reply to me (apparently), and I was going to retype it. Then I saw your message and just replied because it didn't really matter.

I am curious about these things, which is why I "seek out" other data, BEFORE I risk my heath taking a vaccine that is EUA when it appears alternatives like Ivermectin have had studies that they are also HIGHLY effective, but politicians and corrupt government agencies can't make money off of that. I also become extra curious when I see scientists with alternate views being banned from social media, and stripped of their discoveries, for instance the actual doctor who discovered mRNA (Robert Malone), who was removed as the discoverer of mRNA from Wikipedia and a Pfizer shill replaced him when he spoke out about the vaccines. ..and consequently people are trying to get him added back, even people who are pro-vaxxers, because people are starting to worry across the board about mass censorship.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:RNA_vaccine#Revert_removal_of_Robert_Malone_references

I know enough to know that the side effects of these shots is an indicator of clotting from free spike proteins getting into the circulatory system causing thrombosis (headaches, neckaches and backpain), and pulmonary hypertension (reduced effort), which is going to be deadly given enough time of the heart having to work overtime to feed the system.

I also know how to read data.

Science is supposed to welcome debate.
Propaganda doesn't welcome debate.

Science has become propaganda.